Unfortunately the two level 10 guilds I run became victim of a server merge on two accounts.
After the merges, my server85 guild became rank13 and is beyond hope but I refuse to abandon the level 10 investment.
Also, my server81 guild became rank 8 yet is also denied from guild battles?? It says rank 1-8 can play so *** am I denied??
I gained allot from top participant bonus in my very tiny guilds, and would even often win versus other low population guilds or with the help of chariots.
It's a shame I can't benefit from the Guild Battles anymore, and it is actually enough to tempt most people in my situation towards quitting the whole game!
It is seriously a weak game design to base guild rank entirely on overall BR, ignoring the money/time invested and even GB wins.
This flawed game has too many new servers which attracts all the new players there making recruiting impossible.
Either way people ignore the charm of rpgs which is "progress over time" and seek to hand hold top guild anyways, so its obviously an uphill battle trying to increase Guild BR with recruits.
I think it would make more sense if there was a roster limit of like 30 people, then 1-3 guilds wouldn't bait the entire server into them.
G.Ms would be forced to actually recruit based on quality rather than quantity, and it would result in more variety in the Guild Battles.
Whats the fun in 10-15min predictable battles? Seems like a more logical game design to encourage a larger number of teams.
There should clearly be a roster limit and there should obviously be more than 8 guilds allowed to participate.
Its been a few days since the merge but decided to write a rant on the topic. I like the game allot and won't quit despite the disappointing turn of events.
People may suggest I simply quit my investment and hand the hold top dogs like they do, but regardless of that option I was screwed by the lame game design and pointless merging.
After the merges, my server85 guild became rank13 and is beyond hope but I refuse to abandon the level 10 investment.
Also, my server81 guild became rank 8 yet is also denied from guild battles?? It says rank 1-8 can play so *** am I denied??
I gained allot from top participant bonus in my very tiny guilds, and would even often win versus other low population guilds or with the help of chariots.
It's a shame I can't benefit from the Guild Battles anymore, and it is actually enough to tempt most people in my situation towards quitting the whole game!
It is seriously a weak game design to base guild rank entirely on overall BR, ignoring the money/time invested and even GB wins.
This flawed game has too many new servers which attracts all the new players there making recruiting impossible.
Either way people ignore the charm of rpgs which is "progress over time" and seek to hand hold top guild anyways, so its obviously an uphill battle trying to increase Guild BR with recruits.
I think it would make more sense if there was a roster limit of like 30 people, then 1-3 guilds wouldn't bait the entire server into them.
G.Ms would be forced to actually recruit based on quality rather than quantity, and it would result in more variety in the Guild Battles.
Whats the fun in 10-15min predictable battles? Seems like a more logical game design to encourage a larger number of teams.
There should clearly be a roster limit and there should obviously be more than 8 guilds allowed to participate.
Its been a few days since the merge but decided to write a rant on the topic. I like the game allot and won't quit despite the disappointing turn of events.
People may suggest I simply quit my investment and hand the hold top dogs like they do, but regardless of that option I was screwed by the lame game design and pointless merging.
Comment