Speaking purely from a tactical viewpoint in an attempt to excel at cross server guild battle. I want to discuss the double edged sword of guild BR Vs effective guild strength on the cross server GB battlefield.
In my opinion: you need the strong players, but a low guild BR.
So taking the 40-45 strongest players on a server (5 reserve players should be enough) and no others is the best way to place highly in the prelims. If my interpretation is correct.
The strongest players you can muster is obvious, the lower guild BR, makes for easier opponents - as most guilds have gone all out to increase their BR as much as possible. This is where the double edge comes in: close battles are decided on BR, so a low BR is bad. Not that given this tactic, you'd face a guild of any real challenge as most of it's BE would be weaker players.
How many guilds (assuming that once this season ends, another one starts) are going to be dumping all their little players?
In my opinion: you need the strong players, but a low guild BR.
So taking the 40-45 strongest players on a server (5 reserve players should be enough) and no others is the best way to place highly in the prelims. If my interpretation is correct.
The strongest players you can muster is obvious, the lower guild BR, makes for easier opponents - as most guilds have gone all out to increase their BR as much as possible. This is where the double edge comes in: close battles are decided on BR, so a low BR is bad. Not that given this tactic, you'd face a guild of any real challenge as most of it's BE would be weaker players.
How many guilds (assuming that once this season ends, another one starts) are going to be dumping all their little players?
Comment