Knights get only 3 advance runes

[ligerwill7]

guardian rune is more pvp, and like i always say pvp gives almost nothing for your character, unless you want an ego boost, i dont think this guardian rune drama is really anything..sorry if i hurt anyones feelings..

[laba-laba]

Can mages complain too? We have to bring puri to clean those dirty stuff sticking while knights and archer ought to clean their own mess.
Not counting the MASSIVE EXP needed to level advanced guardian is more than that of chaos/amnesia. Knights have it on runes soooooo easy.

[Whispir]

Of course there are differences between Guardian rune and Appolo shield, but that was not my point.

abtrusee's point is that ppl can wait out an apollo/agoran shield and hit a full damage delphic while a mage/archer can time a guardian rune right before a delphic and take a lot less damage making it not as balanced as you said. Knights will already lose a turn on a shield if they sylph or use a rune.

[Gulldan]

i dont think so , a knight have to use apollo shield before sylp , losing 1 turn by sylp , and before the enemy will delp the apollo shield is gone , a archer or mage can use guardian rune just before they see you delp.

Of course there are differences between Guardian rune and Appolo shield, but that was not my point.

[Gulldan]

[QUOTE=denc0;1197106]

Knights can use the Appolo shield as a natural skill, and can have access to purify rune and purge rune (the first similar to the purify skill of mages, and the second like the scatter shot of archers)

Archers can use their natural skill scatter shot, and with runes they can use the guardian shield (to simulate something not similar, but related to the shield of knights) and also the purify abilitty of the mages with the purify rune

Mages can use the natural skill purify, and with runes they can use guardian and purge.

I guess this system is very fair and well balanced for all the 3 classes.



guardian rune can go up to 70%.............. appolo shield s 30%
i hope u see the big difference here

Please, reread what I´ve wrote...
I didnt say Appolo shield is the same as Guardian rune.

I think this system is fair and well balanced, I reaffirm this, as a player that has played as a Knight.

[abstrusee]

i dont think so , a knight have to use apollo shield before sylp , losing 1 turn by sylp , and before the enemy will delp the apollo shield is gone , a archer or mage can use guardian rune just before they see you delp.

[denc0]

[QUOTE=Gulldan;1197078]Knights can use the Appolo shield as a natural skill, and can have access to purify rune and purge rune (the first similar to the purify skill of mages, and the second like the scatter shot of archers)

Archers can use their natural skill scatter shot, and with runes they can use the guardian shield (to simulate something not similar, but related to the shield of knights) and also the purify abilitty of the mages with the purify rune

Mages can use the natural skill purify, and with runes they can use guardian and purge.

I guess this system is very fair and well balanced for all the 3 classes.



guardian rune can go up to 70%.............. appolo shield s 30%
i hope u see the big difference here

[Gulldan]

And the other clases get the OP Guardian rune that can nullify our best attack.

Solution: Give Guardian rune also for knights, or at least dont let Guardian rune to evolve to advance, 50% reduce dmg is already OP...

Knights can use the Appolo shield as a natural skill, and can have access to purify rune and purge rune (the first similar to the purify skill of mages, and the second like the scatter shot of archers)

Archers can use their natural skill scatter shot, and with runes they can use the guardian shield (to simulate something not similar, but related to the shield of knights) and also the purify abilitty of the mages with the purify rune

Mages can use the natural skill purify, and with runes they can use guardian and purge.

I guess this system is very fair and well balanced for all the 3 classes.

PS: I always played as a Knight.