Angel or Knight for all character

[NightV]

Ok list this down since there is a lot of different view on which to use on lvl40 Cute Angel or Chaos Knight its really depend on what you going

for heal or damage if you are a tank knight with really good PDEF and Ton of health that Angel is your choice cause you are a immortal with her.

so what about mage and archer i have to say knight but i do come cross mage using angel with Sunturia on hand just need a good troop count and
you can last forever even lvl80 catacomb above.

archer depended if for pve is angel so they can heal u since archer have crazy damage if u are going for pvp use knight with knight as your troop plus your damage is a power combo team with crazy attack even with healing is hard to recover from the hit from both archer and troop. feel free to give me advice as i still researching on both troop thank you.

[R23221469]

I say knights for all classes... a knight with knights is a real pain in the butt for my mage, even though mdef is low. the player knight swings for the fences, i just pray he hits my troops and not me :/

[Da1Dezzy]

its 20% chance to heal and that chance is multiplied by two so 2x 20% chances

which is *** all lol they might not even do it

catacombs is for knights lol whoever says angels are better is a moron because knights can hit both back and front row so therefore the early stages are sooo much quicker and the knights tanking is epic for later
angels are no good in WB as they heal not attack
also no good in battlegrounds as any pvper worth his wieght will wreck them so fast (i oneshot lvl 20 angels)
i see why people say angels for knights because the heal is a full heal which would make killing a knight ***** hard work lol but then again it will be 3 against one near the end soooo i don't care
i am lvl 40 f2p archer and i have lvl 30 knights and they are EPIC

[R25712627]

thanks for all the discussion now im sure i'll pick knights =)

[御萧xXLJXx]

Having leveled up BOTH to 53




i would say Knight wins

Knight works hand down for every class.

here are the 2 side of the coin, everyone agree that knight do more damage. period. angels heals more period.

and supposedly angels Heals more in BG so it's worth it because you can't use pot in BG. actually that concept works but debatable.

against lower levels noobs it's great to have angels because you are virtually full hp every fight, because even at low hp, next battle start, angel will heal you back up to full.
on the other hand, if you are against player of your caliber or higher stats, angel don't help much because they die very fast when the aoe start raining.

i'm not sure why but at first my reasoning was angel got higher mdef so they should last longer, turn out actually knights last longer due to the higher hp and they hit harder.

I admit i did use angels to finish floor 100 in crypt. but now, it's just way much easier and faster to use knights to finish floor 100 daily.

with crypt key this is what i gain daily


i found that using angels now at higher level just make the fight last longer, using knight actually make it faster because they provide more damage for you to kill floor 100 faster.

and of course everyone also agree on that knight do more damage at WB.

so if you are using angels just for crypt/bg. it's really debatable if it's worth it or not.

for me, i found them to be not as useful as i hoped to be.

anway, ii'm finally 60 now and here are the stats for a 60 knight


cheers.

[Heyamex]

you should got both of them and leveling them lol!!!

[NightV]

its seen its all about balance just like the three character so its really come down on what you plan for wb or catacom.

[dethmatic]

level both i have my knights at 43 angels at 40 i use knights wb angels cata and pvp works well you'll thank me later and no i'm not a casher i just hunt a lot for daru in wilds

[ChieftainRez]

I'm a knight and I chose angels. I do not regret that decision, though I was struggling in WB for a while... so I chose to start slow leveling knights as well on the side. I have now gotten them up to the point where they do a couple thousand a hit, and I stick them up front till they get eaten by the bosses... which is really all they are there for anyways. Let the bosses munch away on them while I smack the living daylights out of it.

As for my angels, yes they can be annoying with the unnecessary heals at times, but I just stick em in back and let them flit around like fools while I hammer away at my opponents and hope they last long enough to give me that clutch heal when I need it. Usually they do more so than not. It was a strain to get them on level with me, and they dropped two levels while I was bringing up the knights for WB, but they are starting to catch up again.

It took patience, and a good bit of theft and a dedication to some lower level MP's with better daru output (especially now that they took the temple out of Badlands... :madface:... ), but with a little hard work, there isn't any reason you can't have them both... at least to a degree.

[R24877577]

Knights vs angel is a personal choice for what you want to do or where you feel you are lacking. Personally, as a knight I love opponents in Arena and BG who have angels. If the player sticks them in front, they get killed easily, If the player stands in front and isn't a knight I get to kill them just as quickly. But then again I have a fairly high Mdef so angels matk only hit for a couple hundred that I shrug off.

So Angels don't heal very effectively for pvp? I just hit 40 and chose knights for my mage as everyone seems to be doing it and that is what was recommended to me. But it is a pain in catacombs right now as my knights are 33 and only tickle the boss (I'm on level 55) and I only have single target heals which I can't use till my knights are dead and I am on low health as I don't want to waste a heal on them due to all the aoe of the boss. It always ends up with me 1 on 1 after my troops are dead trying to heal myself while dealing enough damage to kill the boss first.

[R24365771]

In single arena or bgs Angel's heals are much more important than anything else if the match up is remotely even. If it isnt close to even your troop choice doesnt mean anything anyway. Knights much better against WB.

[R23450065]

Knights vs angel is a personal choice for what you want to do or where you feel you are lacking. Personally, as a knight I love opponents in Arena and BG who have angels. If the player sticks them in front, they get killed easily, If the player stands in front and isn't a knight I get to kill them just as quickly. But then again I have a fairly high Mdef so angels matk only hit for a couple hundred that I shrug off.

[R23604715]

wish that darus may be reset too like skills, I regret choosing angels now

[AngelFiona]

my POV

angels are for knights

and

knights are for mages and archers


as a knight myself iam using angels

and they are really usefull. wb,bg,arena,cata and campaign

and i dont really call them useless even if they heal themselves.

because of the angels high mdef i can clear lvl 65 cata with only using 35 pvp armor minimum socket +12

[JohnNguyen]

I would recommend Knight for Mage.