I made this post in an attempt to provide a little insight into the matchup in Class Wars final and a slight discussion about the final ranking.
With the same number of wins, a higher BR player will be placed higher on the final ranking. I've seen many posts stating that this is unfair and broken, and that lower BR players deserved to be placed higher up (e.g see post: http://forum.r2games.com/showthread....ofcourse/page2). To that, I disagree.
Here is the explanation:
After every round, players are ranked according to their number of wins and BR. In the next round, you are then matched against someone next to you (or close to you). As you win more, the battles get increasingly harder and harder. If you lose,you get a slightly easier battle the next round. It is a self-adjusting mechanism. In the final ranking, even though there are 10 players with 7 wins (say). The player with the highest rank consistently fought and won against players with higher BRs. The player with the lowest rank, on the other hand, fought and won against player of lower BR. Thus, even though all 10 players had 7 wins, the quality of their wins are different.
Number of wins is just a number. It does not reflect the gulf/gap/difficulty of the battles.
As a concluding remark, if you want to be placed in the top 4, you *will* meet the eventual top 3 other many many times in the finals.
So in wagering, do not just look at BR of the players. Make a guess if this player will be able to beat the other few top players, and then place your bet accordingly.
With the same number of wins, a higher BR player will be placed higher on the final ranking. I've seen many posts stating that this is unfair and broken, and that lower BR players deserved to be placed higher up (e.g see post: http://forum.r2games.com/showthread....ofcourse/page2). To that, I disagree.
Here is the explanation:
After every round, players are ranked according to their number of wins and BR. In the next round, you are then matched against someone next to you (or close to you). As you win more, the battles get increasingly harder and harder. If you lose,you get a slightly easier battle the next round. It is a self-adjusting mechanism. In the final ranking, even though there are 10 players with 7 wins (say). The player with the highest rank consistently fought and won against players with higher BRs. The player with the lowest rank, on the other hand, fought and won against player of lower BR. Thus, even though all 10 players had 7 wins, the quality of their wins are different.
Number of wins is just a number. It does not reflect the gulf/gap/difficulty of the battles.
As a concluding remark, if you want to be placed in the top 4, you *will* meet the eventual top 3 other many many times in the finals.
So in wagering, do not just look at BR of the players. Make a guess if this player will be able to beat the other few top players, and then place your bet accordingly.
Comment