Warlock vs Templar at lvl 72

[laba-laba]

Why you have to pick at all.. use both I'm not 72, switching around enlightenment for single troop is painful.
Use both and you can switch around when you like it. Only have 3 troops at my level 68 atm, templar = matk,
warlocks = mdef (class wars) and knights = pdef (before templars).

[GingerTheHutt]

Hope your kidding lol as Templars don't have the MATK stat...

No kidding here.

Templars give me MATK.

[Stronmer]

Warlocks. not good in pvp awsome in pve reasons why,
Warlocks are good when you are facing more then 1 ememy thats basically all.


Tempts.are good for pvp and pve like boss 1 vs 1

[kattuktk]

2.0 isn't very far, because there aren't 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 versions. If R2 don't change, the 2.0 will come after all 1.6 parts is live.

1.6 patch is over i think, next is 1.61 and then 2.0

[ArqBrasil]

2.0 isn't very far, because there aren't 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 versions. If R2 don't change, the 2.0 will come after all 1.6 parts is live.

[EvilOne666]

Actually Evilone i don't agree completely here.

Templars are damn good against single targets.

But i would say i love Warlocks AoE.

I am thinking when i am max lvl and my templars are max lvl then i will work on warlocks. Because in some situations the AoE is very very usefull and they do a good deal of damage.

But against WB and single damage i would say Templar any time.

Hmmm troop AoE is very useful? Just wondering where that might be.

The only place where they dmg really count imo is the world boss and catacombs, everywhere else the important part is hp...

In 2.0 version, the Warlocks have more MATK than Templars have PATK, but Templars still cause more damage. The diference is very low (VERY, VERY, VEEEEEEEEERY LOW), would make very little difference in Enlightnment. In my opinion, Templars are the best, but Warlocks can be good for tankers Knights.

Good to know ^^. Hope I'll be still playing when 2.0 version gets here

[Tehlawlfirm]

Because if the argument is MATK on templars and warlocks are the same then why would you strictly choose templars over warlocks based on enlightenment.... I give up.

[dlch90]

Good day sir.

You call that "Argued templars have more matk than warlock" ? I'm asking you, which part of my sentence says templars have more matk than warlock. Holyshiet you're beyond dumb.

[Tehlawlfirm]

Now, you better read or search properly when or where did i say or argued templars have more mtak attack then warlock. Jesus christ.... Calling me dumb and clueless one by my own argument when you don't even know what you're talking about. GENIUS!

Sorry but only noob mage doesn't take matk from templars as enlighten. So nope ginger isn't kidding, you're clueless.

or was that mistyped? what's the difference if they are equal too mtak on both ends? either way this petty arguement is not helping the person who asked the inital question so drop it.

[dlch90]

Actually it doesn't because as people have stated it's a typo so how if one thing says something in a game I'm suppose to know that it's a typo? 2nd even if all this is true then it wouldn't matter if you picked templars or warlocks because it would be the same percentage which u argued templars have more mtak attack then warlock do which is still wrong. So you are still the dumb clueless one by your own arguement.

It's like the ancient rune packs when people bought them cause it said it came with 3 runes but in reality it only came with one but it was a typo.. you saying those people are dumb because of a typo that noone could know without them actually telling you?

When you do enlightenment on templars for PTAK it strictly says "Increases Player PTAK by % of troops PTAK" when you do enlightement on templars for MATK it says " Increases Player MTAK by % of troops PTAK" Now is it shows Templars don't have MATK and Warlocks do then it's obvious you would want warlocks for the higher MATK if your going for it. If it's a typo then wartune needs to fix it so people know ,.

I still say templars overall are the best no matter class you play, but this whole thing about a typo is rather wrong or if it isn't wrong needs to be changed by wartune so people don't get confused. So even if it was a typo doesnt matter what my opinion was because the stats would have remained equal not less then.

Now, you better read or search properly when or where did i say or argued templars have more mtak attack then warlock. Jesus christ.... Calling me dumb and clueless one by my own argument when you don't even know what you're talking about. GENIUS!

[B4nsh33]

well, its like this. You can use the mdef enlightenment from the warlocks, that would be the best benefit from them. Otherwise, templars are better for tanking for everybody (except against mages cuz we destroy troops). But i have seen some knights that can destroy troops in 3 turns, so I don't see much difference there. I say maybe the warlocks will do more damage to everybody, but ultimately, unless you are using troops for mdef/pdef, it won't make a difference. so if you get both, u can have warlocks for general stuff (and higher mdef) and templars for class wars

[ArqBrasil]

In 2.0 version, the Warlocks have more MATK than Templars have PATK, but Templars still cause more damage. The diference is very low (VERY, VERY, VEEEEEEEEERY LOW), would make very little difference in Enlightnment. In my opinion, Templars are the best, but Warlocks can be good for tankers Knights.

[Tehlawlfirm]

No offense but with the billion typo's wrong translations and what not in this game you think this take precident.

Here let me give you another mistake that has taken them like forever to fix:

Mages Focus original it claimed you got 50% reduction in rage cost when it was actually 30%.

They FINALLY NOW fixed it.

Trust me there are so many wrong translation and typo's in this game you can't dream off.

And they fix it as they see fit when they see fit.

And again its r2 games who simply can't be bothered to fix their own typo.

Yes it does, because you base stuff of what the game states unless told other wise. It's like the crit bonus on jewels, I and many other people believed that it reduces the crit chance against players too, but the 70 jewels say it does not, so I talked to a gm and he said it does not work against players. So without the 70 jewel set saying that I would have never thought to question nor test it. That option isn't there for enlightment, it says one thing and does another. Like i said either way my opinion remains the same cause it's equal to anyways not less then.

Templars are still the better choicenot warlocks

[Nimras186]

Actually it doesn't because as people have stated it's a typo so how if one thing says something in a game I'm suppose to know that it's a typo? 2nd even if all this is true then it wouldn't matter if you picked templars or warlocks because it would be the same percentage which u argued templars have more mtak attack then warlock do which is still wrong. So you are still the dumb clueless one by your own arguement.

It's like the ancient rune packs when people bought them cause it said it came with 3 runes but in reality it only came with one but it was a typo.. you saying those people are dumb because of a typo that noone could know without them actually telling you?

When you do enlightenment on templars for PTAK it strictly says "Increases Player PTAK by % of troops PTAK" when you do enlightement on templars for MATK it says " Increases Player MTAK by % of troops PTAK" Now is it shows Templars don't have MATK and Warlocks do then it's obvious you would want warlocks for the higher MATK if your going for it. If it's a typo then wartune needs to fix it so people know ,.

I still say templars overall are the best no matter class you play, but this whole thing about a typo is rather wrong or if it isn't wrong needs to be changed by wartune so people don't get confused.

No offense but with the billion typo's wrong translations and what not in this game you think this take precident.

Here let me give you another mistake that has taken them like forever to fix:

Mages Focus original it claimed you got 50% reduction in rage cost when it was actually 30%.

They FINALLY NOW fixed it.

Trust me there are so many wrong translation and typo's in this game you can't dream off.

And they fix it as they see fit when they see fit.

And again its r2 games who simply can't be bothered to fix their own typo.

[Tehlawlfirm]

It's funny when the clueless one is calling me dumb. You're still clueless and that doesn't change the fact. Now that makes you dumb & clueless.

Actually it doesn't because as people have stated it's a typo so how if one thing says something in a game I'm suppose to know that it's a typo? 2nd even if all this is true then it wouldn't matter if you picked templars or warlocks because it would be the same percentage which u argued templars have more mtak attack then warlock do which is still wrong. So you are still the dumb clueless one by your own arguement.

It's like the ancient rune packs when people bought them cause it said it came with 3 runes but in reality it only came with one but it was a typo.. you saying those people are dumb because of a typo that noone could know without them actually telling you?

When you do enlightenment on templars for PTAK it strictly says "Increases Player PTAK by % of troops PTAK" when you do enlightement on templars for MATK it says " Increases Player MTAK by % of troops PTAK" Now is it shows Templars don't have MATK and Warlocks do then it's obvious you would want warlocks for the higher MATK if your going for it. If it's a typo then wartune needs to fix it so people know ,.

I still say templars overall are the best no matter class you play, but this whole thing about a typo is rather wrong or if it isn't wrong needs to be changed by wartune so people don't get confused. So even if it was a typo doesnt matter what my opinion was because the stats would have remained equal not less then.