Archers bloodthirsty strike

[ancev]

damage is done but the shield absorbs it so it still counts

true but somehow i think the HP absorbed when hitting a shield is always less then the same HP absorbed while doing regular damage (exluding critical. same damage on same knight, with and without shield on).

[liquid_oxygen]

true but somehow i think the HP absorbed when hitting a shield is always less then the same HP absorbed while doing regular damage (exluding critical. same damage on same knight, with and without shield on).

yes that is true

[d07.RiV]

Are you sure 70% increased by 10% should be 80% and not 77%?

Also, instinct increases damage, not healing, so it should not be 85%.

Also, the 50%/100% etc debuff in long battles does not affect BT heal, since the debuff is applied after all other calculations.

[krackenker]

Are you sure 70% increased by 10% should be 80% and not 77%?

Also, instinct increases damage, not healing, so it should not be 85%.

Also, the 50%/100% etc debuff in long battles does not affect BT heal, since the debuff is applied after all other calculations.

IF dmg is increased, then so is healing since of those extra 5%, u get 5*x% healed as bonus healing:P, it just doesnt increase the % healed

[d07.RiV]

Yes, healing will be increased by 5%, but it will still be 80% (or 77%) of damage done.

[djimmy006]

Now guys... R2 staff should fix the BT strike skill, because it really does not work like on inscription! I am dealing 10k normal with it and absorbing only 3k, sometimes I crit for 24-25 and I absorb 6-7. That is not near 40%, not to mention 50% and what will leave for 80%???