Who says knights are weak :p

[kingofgamez]

a few dryads and boom

[BawlsofSteel]

Also i would like to add that the amethyst mine, guardian arena and things like that in the future patches are all PvP based and troop counts and stuff will come to play a huge role there. So saying that PvP aspect is not important is maybe true right now but wont be the same in the coming days. I expect to see a lot of knights flaming over how they get walled by the troops

I do just fine in all aspects of the game and i do not get walled in any pvp matchups i get other then the occasional mage

[-Eilistraee-]

Resource officers - 500 points plus 1 minute respawn, can be a BG win/lose determinant at times

Eili

[Mugetsu110]

Next week i'll try too to kill the officer

pff james we all know how u were killed by Hobo in bg with 7k br difference

and PS i saw a video of an archer who had 100k hp with drayad almost killed the officer he just needed one more strike ,,

his troops suked though coz he was lvl 54

archers must be really the best i think , coz that guy had 70k br without drayad at lvl 54 .. he just messed his skills a bit but then archers are OP at very many places no matter who ignores them

[Killick74]

I don't see your pdef being high enough to tank his amount of patk lol. It's only 14k. Also you are sacrificing your mdef for crit which will eventually make things worse in the long run. You are dead meat against other mages and in CW. I guess it's possible right now you might have a chance but keep in mind he doesn't even has his set done yet. By the time he gets his set done you be back from the beginning and can't win again. Anyways though claiming that all knights suck is stupid since no knights are far from being the worst class. They fall short against mages but they are suppose to fall short against mages. Lastly, i doubt you can tank better than a knight with 14k pdef and 63k hp lol. Really like to see you tank lych nm or something with those stats.

No, he does quite well in CW and can tank well too. Kicks my butt with my higher mdef and fairly high will destroyer.

[Bigal7733]

......................

[miQQQs]

what reward you get after beating the Resource officer ?

500 team points and they cant cart 30 sec^^ or i'm wrong, will do this 2day and post result^^

[ShiKKihS]

why need to tank? rage rune + EDD, they normally 1hit die

try that in 70-79 BG

[wateverlar]

why need to tank? rage rune + EDD, they normally 1hit die

[jamesbacmon]

Next week i'll try too to kill the officer

[jamesbacmon]

what reward you get after beating the Resource officer ?

[tyluvme]

sigh been there done that only ones i cant beat are the ones that are hard cashers

[thegoldgun68]

Go beat a Knight as a Mage with no troops if you think knights suck...then you will see whos better at tanking.

[tyluvme]

while knights might have been meant to tank what they bring to the table doesn't outweigh what an archer or mage could bring in there place

[0xykotton]

correction they are all heavy casher knights

Still doesn't take away the fact that knights are meant to tank. Even medium cash knights do pretty well in everything. They still out beat archers within the same BR most of the time and they still tank very well for MPs and spire. Mages will always outshine knight as they are suppose to outshine knights. So you can't really compare mages to knights.