Ppl like complain aBout something what others have...this is human nature
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sylph in Class Wars? Enabled?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by winlord View PostI agree, but you should notice who starts this in almost EVERY topic on the forum.Originally posted by Wraithraiser
Welcome to R2 forums. Where quality is nonexistent and quantity is only measured in the number of whines a single day can produce.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheGuardingDark View PostLets keep to the topic at hand folksOriginally posted by winlord View PostI agree, but you should notice who starts this in almost EVERY topic on the forum.Originally posted by Arlad View PostI agree, please notice who is the one who started to insult others by calling them stupid or dumb.| GNUTerryPrachett |
| |
| | | |
Comment
-
There's a part of me that wishes Slyphs will not be allowed in CW. That's because if it is, I will most certainly not make the finals any more; I do not have any Apollos. On the other hand there's a part of me that knows that players should get to enjoy what they have worked/paid for - it's only fair. They paid for an Apollo, they deserve to destroy me and my free Iris.
Can't really decide.[S1] Temple of Ibalize
Frostie
Mage
VictisHNR
Comment
-
Originally posted by FrostieTheSnowman View PostThere's a part of me that wishes Slyphs will not be allowed in CW. That's because if it is, I will most certainly not make the finals any more; I do not have any Apollos. On the other hand there's a part of me that knows that players should get to enjoy what they have worked/paid for - it's only fair. They paid for an Apollo, they deserve to destroy me and my free Iris.
Can't really decide.
Comment
-
Originally posted by S44-ZEREF View Postpeople worked for hs we shouldnt ban it from cw
That said, the Sylph thing is much more of a fairer playing field. Obviously higher levels can gain more XP. The difference is that Sylph and Sylph leveling is available to everyone. The level bias like that of HS is to a greater extent much less. Of course a higher level can earn a lot more XP and thus level their Sylphs faster, so the bias is there, but it's not comparably so OP in my opinion.
However, Sylph in CW will be hideously OP at the end of the day.
I don't really care for either in CW.Originally posted by CreamySaucepanYou are just a freakozoid... Monster of Frankenstein meets Jabba the Hutt... Frabba the Huttstein... :POriginally posted by CreamySaucepanBehind every fat Space Slug is a blood thirsty sociopath urging it on.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GingerTheHutt View PostPersonally, while I can see the appeal of HS, for an event which is based on player strength, HS is very OP. Especially when you look at the inability of a lvl 50 to compete on a HS level with a lvl 80. Multiple turns of stun Vs an opponent who's only strength over you is 5 levels is beyond harsh.
That said, the Sylph thing is much more of a fairer playing field. Obviously higher levels can gain more XP. The difference is that Sylph and Sylph leveling is available to everyone. The level bias like that of HS is to a greater extent much less. Of course a higher level can earn a lot more XP and thus level their Sylphs faster, so the bias is there, but it's not comparably so OP in my opinion.
However, Sylph in CW will be hideously OP at the end of the day.
I don't really care for either in CW.
Comment
-
Originally posted by S44-ZEREF View Posths makes weaker people beat stronger people and sylphs do same thing so they arent comparebly? hmmm
Comment
-
I personally don't care much, but a sylph active can beat someone 5k higher br then themselfs, if the person is on bot/afk.
But in CW both accounts have a chance of high sylph and using the power, can we argue that a 52 shouldn't fight a 72 cause they have higher lvl skills and more atk power?
It's all up for questioning, but it's the way r2games has made it, in a sense it doesn't matter much, in a other hand, it matters as far as player strength goes.
You basically have the one or the other.
Edit: HS is player limited eventually, but so are sylphs limited to the players lvl.
in my eyes sylphs are more fair since slow lvlers can obtain sepulchrum witouth gaining exp, as well as people who lvl normally, In and all, i think it gives a more fair playing field, but that's my opinionCharacter name: Silence
Class: mage.
Server: 490.
Level 44.
Comment
-
Over and over...Ehh
Evryone can get sylph? Yes
Evryone can use it on cw? Yes
Higher lvl have adventage and slow lvlrs dis-adv? This is your personal chose which way u play .
I dont care aBout slow lvlrs and ppl who dont have apollo problems, what i see most of complainers here are mages, where free pan will be stronger then apollo.
Slow lvlrs get limited sylph v? This is not high lvlrs fault.
This is not theard aBout hs but aBout sylph so stop compare this both things
Sylph will be or not in cw, can u just w8 for event and stop complain how bad this will be before start of cw?
Ty
_________
Crit Mage 80v
~135k Br
_________
Comment
-
The main thing about Sylph in CW is the "pets dmg"
in Mage battle, a Pan can deal insanely amount of physical damage (you probably won't even reach 100% timer)
while in Archer and Knight battle, either Iris or Apollo will do the same as above and wipe the floor.
Expecially Apollo, as they get double AoE, and one of the AoE seems to heal self while at it.
And a Knight with Iris will have mass healing war like Mages now.
Comment
Comment