Originally posted by R21577189
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fix knights
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by kattuktk View PostThats what Im trying to make these idiots understand, but alas they would never trust me that knights are the worst class in the game
Comment
-
Originally posted by S44-ZEREF View Posteasier then mage?okay let me teach you how to beat mage....start with luna then spam ap use bloodthirsty if neccesary then go sylpg warm spring/rain dance(depending on hp) archeron wave(shoulld be ready and 50% time usually) and baam lots of crit heals and atacks and win!
You should be able to defend troops from lunatic, heal from ap spam (not to mention an archer is not able to do it very much without a lot of stocked up rage). When they go sylph, drop a blood rune and use heal before entering sylph and kill them with your blood rune ticking hard on them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by R25283719 View Postmy knigh not strong yet. but i always believe knigh is the best class.
Comment
-
That's why knights build crit now, basically making archers weak. Normally it's ok to think archer could kill knights with gaia, but a crit knight > archer.
Again it's ok, they're meant to kill us. My problem is how difficult it is for archers to kill mages now (good mages).
Well built crit mages are a problem for both knights and archers, and any mage not agreeing with this, just hasn't built a good mage.
Not saying archers and knights can't kill them, but archers for example aren't supposed to have that many problems doing so.
While knights are our achilles heal, we're the mages their problem... The way it is now, we're having problems beating both.Player Class: Archer
Battle Rating : 162k+
^ Manly purple!
Comment
-
ye archers was the weakest class since this game got launched and still is. If u have 3 chars of evry class all lvl 80 and evryone spend same much money archer cant win. The problem is easy. Knights and Mages can have at least same high burst damage as archers but knights tank alot more and mages got very much mdef + got heal. So due to the pdef of knight a pattack sylph would be useless against them while with a mattck sylph u also cant have alot higher damage then knights due to there build in damage reduction they get from passive. And with a mattack sylph u wont do any damage to mages really. Since archers also dont have high mdef, at least not high enough to effectivley reduce the damage of mages they get destroyed from mage wich give u a 12k+ bleed after 50% timer + very high magic damage.
So if anyone disagree with something or got any tipps for archers feel free to post em cause for right now archer is weakest class in my opinion and other pepole dont know how hard it is for us if we have to face those 140k br crit knights and mages with 7k + crit. Archers would need a passive buff with + 20% mdef or something to become usefull in pvp.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IggyBousse View PostNice logic, because we're currently most useful in MDs, we're overpowered.
Let's not forget the lower levels, which are most of the 60- ones, where we were least useful, and mage were dominating them all, but hey just because we do well in the 60s and higher in MDs (!!), we are just so overpowered.
GREAT DEDUCTION!
(I hope you noticed my sarcasm...)
Originally posted by R226935530 View Postye archers was the weakest class since this game got launched and still is. If u have 3 chars of evry class all lvl 80 and evryone spend same much money archer cant win. The problem is easy. Knights and Mages can have at least same high burst damage as archers but knights tank alot more and mages got very much mdef + got heal. So due to the pdef of knight a pattack sylph would be useless against them while with a mattck sylph u also cant have alot higher damage then knights due to there build in damage reduction they get from passive. And with a mattack sylph u wont do any damage to mages really. Since archers also dont have high mdef, at least not high enough to effectivley reduce the damage of mages they get destroyed from mage wich give u a 12k+ bleed after 50% timer + very high magic damage.
So if anyone disagree with something or got any tipps for archers feel free to post em cause for right now archer is weakest class in my opinion and other pepole dont know how hard it is for us if we have to face those 140k br crit knights and mages with 7k + crit. Archers would need a passive buff with + 20% mdef or something to become usefull in pvp.IGN: Athena
Guild: Warriors
Server: S5 - Roaring Wetlands
Class: Archer
Difficulty Level: Noob
BR: 176k / 180k (with block and hp astral instead of illusion and deflect =P)
Comment
-
Originally posted by bakuryuuha View PostI dunno..i still think archers are the best XD in fact we can clear lych nm with just 4 archers. Its a little tough without suntoria and puri from mage, but a couple archers with iris keeps our hp high with a few bloodthirsty strikes here and there. But anyway, knights definitely do not suck. They must not have fought against a knight where 90% of your hits either get a) Deflected by deflection astral+talent, b) blocked 9 out of 10 hits, c) dodged with illusion astral, d) crit hit from ult slasher hits as hard as your delphic crits on him/her, e) all that healing from the blocking kind of healed all that dmg done by your delphic few seconds ago...but of course...such a knight is only possible through cashing, but even without cash its possible to achieve 50% or more of such things if you planned your development right. Furthermore they have advantage in any kind of br event since they have more passives that boosts stats affecting one's BR. In fact in chinese WT, bulk of the top players are either knights/mage. You don't see lots of archers at the top for a reason...
With the clothing leveled, the massive penetration/armor reduction from fate and such, archer can be incredibly strong, untill a crit mage/knights comes along with equal cash.
You just said it yourself, the chinese are ahead of us by miles and seeing top archers is alot less frequent than seeing the other classes. Which is logical.Player Class: Archer
Battle Rating : 162k+
^ Manly purple!
Comment
-
Originally posted by IggyBousse View PostLmao DEEP FREEZE FTW *grin*.
Comment
-
Originally posted by R226935530 View Postif at least armor piercer would lower defence by 10% each time u attack it would make sense with this skill. But lower def by 250 each time what a joke??. U think a 140k br knight or higher care if he have 1000 pdef more or less in fight. The developers really did such a laughable job while creating this skill. Well but ill keep my archer since dont have enough money to start other char i would take knights probably cause they pretty cool. But i dont understand the flame threads of the knights while evryone know that around 100k br already we archers having really hard against knight with same br. the knights can take out troops same fast as archer at a certian br so no difference in that just that after that with edd they got alot burst damage on archer while archer do them nothing with his delphic.
us east top knight has 145k br on r2 server
Comment
-
Originally posted by lillytvn4 View PostNot strong "yet"? they never become strong bro, I have seen that. Here's an advise - Pick either a mage or an archer, I prefer archers now that sylph system has come, mages are good too, they used to be xtremely OP before the sylph system but now I believe them to be equal with the archers, choice is yours
Comment
Comment