snerispl twice
oops entered captcha in title xD
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Asst Guild Master and Guild Master
Collapse
X
-
I'm not sure how to respond entirely, but I certainly agree that Asst GM's need more rights. Officers can keep the rights they have, because they are able to kick people and approve of their Guild applications. But Asst GM rights is another issue. They are next in line to keeping the Guild stable when the GM is offline. And let's face it, if you have an inactive GM, people are going to leave because the Guild won't get upgraded, nor will the tree be summoned. This will result in the death of the Guild. If Asst GM's could do both of these, then the members would be satisfied. Plus, it would mean the GM would be able to deal with real life issues without having to worry about his/her Guild going into a crisis due to their online activity.
Leave a comment:
-
Asst guild masters and officers need more power
As the title say they need more power what's the purpose of promoting them and they can do nothing important like summon tree and divine alter. Also there should be some rewards for them as well because they help out but only guild master gets title and mount, btw I and guild master of legion from s 429
Leave a comment:
-
How about, The Guild Master has the option to decide which Assist. Can bring the tree in his abscence? This would have been a good feature added to the game to help the Guild Masters.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TWall View Postby this reasoning, you shouldn't give Asst GM's any authority. what if they kick someone the GM likes or accepts someone the GM doesn't. would you demote them then too? its about communication and sticking to a posted schedule. and if youve got an Asst GM that cant do that, then youre issue isn't with giving them that authority; its with trusting them, and you'd have the same issue with the three primary people to give leadership to. if you trust them to give them leadership, then you should trust them to summon at the scheduled time if youre not there even without you handing them leadership.
i think this is a good idea because life happens. its easy to pass on leadership when you know about issues. problem is with life, you wont always know about them ahead of time, or even if you know ahead of time, you may not have access to a computer to handover leadership.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Shayuu View PostI think this would lead to a disaster. You might have an AGM that decides they want to summon the tree a little early because they feel everyone is online at a certain time. They summon tree, GM logs on, kicks or demotes AGM, they get mad and might leave guild, some may follow, chaos. If the issue is the GM is never there when they're suppose to, you need a new GM. I'm the GM of my guild and if there is a slight chance I might not make it for tree or divine altar, I have three primary people that I ask if they'll make it to summon it and give leadership to them. If the GM doesn't want to do that, then don't know what kind of leader people follow that only cares about walking around saying he's in charge. I feel like this issue could just be resolved with better leadership in command.
i think this is a good idea because life happens. its easy to pass on leadership when you know about issues. problem is with life, you wont always know about them ahead of time, or even if you know ahead of time, you may not have access to a computer to handover leadership.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Shayuu View PostI think this would lead to a disaster. You might have an AGM that decides they want to summon the tree a little early because they feel everyone is online at a certain time. They summon tree, GM logs on, kicks or demotes AGM, they get mad and might leave guild, some may follow, chaos. If the issue is the GM is never there when they're suppose to, you need a new GM. I'm the GM of my guild and if there is a slight chance I might not make it for tree or divine altar, I have three primary people that I ask if they'll make it to summon it and give leadership to them. If the GM doesn't want to do that, then don't know what kind of leader people follow that only cares about walking around saying he's in charge. I feel like this issue could just be resolved with better leadership in command.
Yes, I agree that if the G.M is unable to get online for any reason, that they should hand over their leadership over to someone else temporarily. All in all, I do agree with this point. But, I still think allowing the Asst G.M's the right to upgrade the Guild wouldn't cause any harm. The tree may be something else to consider, following this point.
Leave a comment:
-
I think this would lead to a disaster. You might have an AGM that decides they want to summon the tree a little early because they feel everyone is online at a certain time. They summon tree, GM logs on, kicks or demotes AGM, they get mad and might leave guild, some may follow, chaos. If the issue is the GM is never there when they're suppose to, you need a new GM. I'm the GM of my guild and if there is a slight chance I might not make it for tree or divine altar, I have three primary people that I ask if they'll make it to summon it and give leadership to them. If the GM doesn't want to do that, then don't know what kind of leader people follow that only cares about walking around saying he's in charge. I feel like this issue could just be resolved with better leadership in command.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Blaiyn View PostUpdating so that Asst Guild Masters could upgrade the Guild, AND summon the Guild Tree would really help. I've noticed that members tend to leave the Guild if the G.M is offline for a couple of hours, and the Guild doesn't receive any upgrades. It is the same for the Tree of Ancients. If the G.M isn't online, the Guild TOA cannot be summoned. If Asst G.M's could be able to summon the TOA, the problem wouldn't matter if the G.M wasn't actually online.
Basically, Asst G.M's, in my opinion, need more rights.
+1 since alot of lag and load issues have been happening , i think as assistant GM must have more rights since GM cant be online the whole time
i think its a good suggestion
Leave a comment:
-
both of those ideas have been suggested over and over again, but they still didnt implement anything
Leave a comment:
-
or alternatively the Guild Master has the ability to set a specific time for the tree to auto spawn.
Leave a comment:
-
As a g.m of my guild, i say this is a good idea.
Even though I'm around during the setted tree timefor my guild,
sometimes due of work and a real life, i can't be around always at that time.
Wich tree will be belated and people will go offline if its not there.
If an assistant could put it there anyway instead of waiting for me to return is just perfect
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: