Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Same old story for mages

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Caballero1321 View Post
    I'm comparing myself (118k mage) to 155k+ mage or 125k-130k archers.

    I did WB with a char who had 4k more matk than me. Then I did even better and finished in top3 overall in WB easily

    Btw. I'm sure my rota would suck on knights because of their long cooldowns on basic skills. On archers and mages works perfeclty.
    I said worse/better players, not higher/lower br ones, but i do agree with you, rotation is what wins at wb. But rotation depends on few things, mainly lag and can you use runes and hits in 1 turn, can you double at all, do you have the right runes, are you lucky with crits etc essentials.
    I have 1 rotation in lagfree days and very different in bad ones.
    THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE'S JUST ME.

    Comment


    • #17
      That's what I said - rotation, doubles (both foot and sylph) make the difference.
      And you mentioned one important factor. Luckily, I have no lags at all on WB.

      Hard to determine which player is better. I'm usually worse on WB than an archer who's never made CW finals and usually better than the other one who's been in most of CW finals.

      Comment

      Working...
      X