Hello , i guess everyone know how useless it is to have a lot of matt as an knight or archer and patt in the case of an mage.
So the question i am asking to myself since months is - why did that count on BR then when its useless at all?
So why dont change the formular from 1 matt = 1 br for archers and knights into 1 matt = 0 br ? (u still got the matt but it dont count into br at all)
The same thing for patt in the case of an Mage ofc.
At the moment the br say not to many about a strengh of someone and this change would help to lower the problem about the fake br.
I am personaly a archer with 130k br and only 4,4k matt and for me its a bit annoying to see that other ppl with fake br get into the top 100 on cw (even if i manage to have 11 wins in preline).
Also the br ranking at all would be changed by that so i would like to hear other opinions about dealing with it ( i know its my personal problem that i dont want to push my matt ^^).
sorry for the worse english and best regards
So the question i am asking to myself since months is - why did that count on BR then when its useless at all?
So why dont change the formular from 1 matt = 1 br for archers and knights into 1 matt = 0 br ? (u still got the matt but it dont count into br at all)
The same thing for patt in the case of an Mage ofc.
At the moment the br say not to many about a strengh of someone and this change would help to lower the problem about the fake br.
I am personaly a archer with 130k br and only 4,4k matt and for me its a bit annoying to see that other ppl with fake br get into the top 100 on cw (even if i manage to have 11 wins in preline).
Also the br ranking at all would be changed by that so i would like to hear other opinions about dealing with it ( i know its my personal problem that i dont want to push my matt ^^).
sorry for the worse english and best regards
Comment