I think its very urgent to this pleasant
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Set pvp 65
Collapse
X
-
Lol... 60th set needs like 4 months to get enough crystaloids/shards to make it (if you don't do keyruns) and 12k insignia/piece to make it legendary. I don't even dare to imagine what would such set cost.Server: 110 Providence
Class: Knight
Guild: Phoenix
Nickname: Belhor
Level: 80
Battle rating: 190588
Comment
-
Originally posted by Belhor1993 View PostLol... 60th set needs like 4 months to get enough crystaloids/shards to make it (if you don't do keyruns) and 12k insignia/piece to make it legendary. I don't even dare to imagine what would such set cost.
I believe this lvl 65 should be implemented so we can have a choise at least, having just one option is boring, no variety at all
Comment
-
Actually pvp set is better because of the armor ignore. If you have 55th and you fight with someone who got 50th you'll win, his only bonus is a little more patk/pdef and more rage, your bonus is 2000 armor ignore. If he set 2 delph he won't be able to use shield or aoe so i still don't dare to imagine what such set would cost because there will be even more armor ignore.
Edit: Naveron is right.Last edited by Belhor1993; 11-13-2013, 01:11 PM.Server: 110 Providence
Class: Knight
Guild: Phoenix
Nickname: Belhor
Level: 80
Battle rating: 190588
Comment
-
Originally posted by Naveron View Posti wouldn't choose 65 pvp set for life. pve set wins.
i will soon dry of rage if i use pvp set & wouldn't be able to use most of skills with it.League of Angels
SERVER ->> [S182] Snakemoor Fen
ALLIANCE ->> Asgard
GUILD ->> AnOnYmOuS
CLASS ->> SORCERER
LVL ->> 82
BR ->> 3 136 506
Comment
-
Originally posted by JlamronX View PostWHat i BET i will kill easily pve 60 with pvp 65. better than with pvp 55,,,
im quiet sure of itOriginally posted by Wraithraiser
Welcome to R2 forums. Where quality is nonexistent and quantity is only measured in the number of whines a single day can produce.
Comment
-
Wat these people are forgetting that say pvp set beat the lower pve set, is that high levels equals more health, equals longer fights.
If both are geared the same way(wings, clothes etc). PVE leg will beat PVP of the higher level 50+, before that, at 40 vs 45, it might be a close fight.
When matches start to last longer than 4-5 turns, pve set will outshine pvp set.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Draggyy View Postwell pvp sets are weaker than the pve sets, and costs a lot less. Its true that pve set is adictive, but some don't want to wait for so long to get it.
I believe this lvl 65 should be implemented so we can have a choise at least, having just one option is boring, no variety at allIGN: Athena
Guild: Warriors
Server: S5 - Roaring Wetlands
Class: Archer
Difficulty Level: Noob
BR: 176k / 180k (with block and hp astral instead of illusion and deflect =P)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Belhor1993 View PostActually pvp set is better because of the armor ignore. If you have 55th and you fight with someone who got 50th you'll win, his only bonus is a little more patk/pdef and more rage, your bonus is 2000 armor ignore. If he set 2 delph he won't be able to use shield or aoe so i still don't dare to imagine what such set would cost because there will be even more armor ignore.
Edit: Naveron is right.
Yeah sure the armour ignore is nice. But with the PvE set, you get higher stats and +damage, which equals out the defence ignore. Then the PvE set gives you a lot more rage to cast stronger skills more often. PvE set wins, everytime. Period.Originally posted by CreamySaucepanYou are just a freakozoid... Monster of Frankenstein meets Jabba the Hutt... Frabba the Huttstein... :POriginally posted by CreamySaucepanBehind every fat Space Slug is a blood thirsty sociopath urging it on.
Comment
Comment