game is so cool

[Givemelots]

Doing cross server going for 3rd win in a row when not 1 but 2 lvl 81s showed upped on blue team. This unbalenced garbage cause by coiners *EDIT*

[toxicode95]

I'm not really approving the way cs runs right now either, but hey.. that's the way it's always been,
the strong gets all, and the weak can only crawl on the ground hoping they got some strong ppl to do the work

[uxu4n]

Since when does lv81 = "coiners" ?

I am not sure your logic is sound...maybe try to run what you say through your head and write it down and read it over a few times before you post?

[ancient50]

I gave up tonight myself just cant compete at all and after 54 forget cross server its a waste of time

[R279752293]

The reason for that balance is because of lack of participant in your bracket and because of that unbalance, people will not participate in CS creating an endless loop of ****. They reduce the amount needed to participate from 10v10 to 7v7 but it hardly change the outcome of the team.

[HeavyWind]

we CANT PLAY CS !!!!!!! arghhhh -_-.................. well good for you if CS work on yourserver

[chrysalizzz]

we dont have also....heavywind...s151 same oceanic with you

[Oculos]

I do feel there should be a new cap, especially for 55-65 players, but right now best you can do is hope for the best, and stick at your mining

[ajax408]

so when i do CS 4 vs 7 and we lose its becouse i suck u have weird thinking

[blahblah11]

I think the logical issue here is level bracket...It doesn't matter how much you improve yourself individually, unless you spend thousands of dollar, you'll never catch up to the top 500. With that being said, a valid complaint is level bracket is CS, it is -unfair- for level 55 to be pinned against level 80s, or even 70s. Is it their fault for not playing this game since the opening? No, stop being dumb. A simple solution is to add more brackets for those players, 55-69, 70+ ect.

[KristoS151]

I think the logical issue here is level bracket...It doesn't matter how much you improve yourself individually, unless you spend thousands of dollar, you'll never catch up to the top 500. With that being said, a valid complaint is level bracket is CS, it is -unfair- for level 55 to be pinned against level 80s, or even 70s. Is it their fault for not playing this game since the opening? No, stop being dumb. A simple solution is to add more brackets for those players, 55-69, 70+ ect.

We been there before dude .... CS with level groups --- result , Long time Queuing
even now without level group CS que sometimes took 20+ minutes, imagine if level grouping.
I would rather enter CS losing badly, than have to wait long time.
Besides the reward from CS is not so significant

[blahblah11]

Yes, you would rather join and lose just to get 3 daily out of the way, you may find some sort of enjoyment or satisfaction out it, however this thread isn't about you, or others who feel the same you do you. It's to voice opinion on those who would enjoy CS more if they had a chance vs player with similar level, not just going through the motion of completing daily task. This isn't to debate whether or not the reward is significant, it is a feature with the game, and thus it should be made for everyone to enjoy, not just you, or others who think like you. So if you feel that the queue is too long if bracket is made, a simple solution of allowing players to chose whether they would like to queue up with a certain bracket, or a queue where all levels are allowed.

[hunuot]

Yes, you would rather join and lose just to get 3 daily out of the way, you may find some sort of enjoyment or satisfaction out it, however this thread isn't about you, or others who feel the same you do you.

So if you feel that the queue is too long if bracket is made, a simple solution of allowing players to chose whether they would like to queue up with a certain bracket, or a queue where all levels are allowed.

If the queues get too long, what is likely to end up happening is lopsided games of another variety where players who have been queued for 43 minutes don't respond to the notice in time, and you end up playing a 6 vs 4 game, or arguably worse, joining a 6v4 game halfway through and being 300-400 points behind.

[KristoS151]

So if you feel that the queue is too long if bracket is made, a simple solution of allowing players to chose whether they would like to queue up with a certain bracket, or a queue where all levels are allowed.

Well let see it this way :

1. First CS is group bracket ....
2. Then many people complain about queuing time.
3. So they change CS without grouping ...
4. Queuing time improved .
5. Then people complain about unbalance teams.

So if u want to propose improvement dont go back to point 1, otherwise we will face eternal loop of problems.
Make an idea that can solve both Queuing time and Unbalance team.


My idea is make CS close timed event ... like other event and making it level bracket.
3 period of time for CS, 1H each. Or maybe 2 period with better rewards.
Dont know what wil happen though, might result in new problems.

[tduren90]

Even at later levels when you actually can take on the enemy team you still get matches where you get curb stomped by better people, thats just how this game is. Its nothing to complain about. You could also try not suiciding into the high levels all the time and kill guys your level...but that(in my opinion) is a greedy/bad player only looking out for themselves.