Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The "I want BG by BR!" thread [merged threads]
Collapse
X
-
I think the lvls are messed up, now that its cross-server, it should be like 30-34, 35-39, 40-44... and so on. That would make much more interesting BG's, instead of 35/45/55 rush to get the arena set and be able to fight back.
-
Originally posted by GingerTheHutt View PostMVP should be the player who earns the most points... regardless of winning or losing.
BG is good as it is now.
Ginger - and dont complain until you get into 70+ BattleHell where virtually everyone has 20+ HS and 50K+ BRLast edited by Byronsan; 03-04-2013, 06:50 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GingerTheHutt View PostMVP should be the player who earns the most points... regardless of winning or losing.
Leave a comment:
-
MVP should be the player who earns the most points... regardless of winning or losing.
Leave a comment:
-
this would help reduce the bullying..
NEW RULE: each player begins with 3 'attack points'... every time a player attacks another player he is charged one 'attack point'... if a player has no 'attack points' he may not attack anyone (but may still be attacked)... returning ore to the base earns 3 'attack points'...
the way it is now, battleground is like salmon (low-level players) running up stream with bears (high-level players) there to make meals of them... there is virtually no incentive to collect ore for high level players who know they can dominate the field... which is odd since the game is 'won' by collecting ore! it is a very sad design feature that the MVP is the one with the most kills... EVEN IF HE OR SHE IS NOT ON THE WINNING TEAM! how the hell can the MVP be on the LOSING team...? it makes no sense...
and the visibility within 10 levels is TOO large... this should be reduced to 5 levels...
Leave a comment:
-
yes, but I saw more Elite Warriors than I did Crusader, which struck me as odd
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Oxykotton View PostI doubt this is the case. It seems to me that most of them just didn't do BG until now. I just really don't see why there tons of 60s of crusader rank. Makes no sense.
It's also possible these players thought that the obtainable steed was "good enough" (!).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KnowingEyes7 View PostReasons? Population on certain servers was low(er). Some cashers didn't BG due to time constraints. Certain players enjoy playing the spoiler.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AlexandrusS5 View PostI personally have noticed a large population of the 60's are very low rank, Elite Warrior & Crusader, this makes it difficult for those who've gotten higher ranks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AlexandrusS5 View PostI personally have noticed a large population of the 60's are very low rank, Elite Warrior & Crusader, this makes it difficult for those who've gotten higher ranks.
Leave a comment:
-
I personally have noticed a large population of the 60's are very low rank, Elite Warrior & Crusader, this makes it difficult for those who've gotten higher ranks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LordRaider View PostI would like to add some comment too, sorry I forgot before
Battlegrounds are not collectcrystalsground as one of my servermates said. Whoever really battled, that one must be now Elite Crusader at least. Honor losses are not so heavy in my personal case.
I am in 70+ BG group and am one of the weakest. But usually i end with ... lets say ... +80 honor and thats good. I am getting pawned a lot, but its still better than bullying lower levels.
New BG suits me (just personal comment, no arguing with others here).
Therefore very high rangs made by pawning weak alts of other players means now issue. Getting pawned because of collecting crystals only and having too low medallion is now an issue.
But honestly...issue of improper playing I would say. Correct me if I am wrong, of course
I lost to a lvl 60 knight crusader i am Crusader -200 honor, then i lost to a lvl 69 crusader -400 honor.
I have given up on BG i have no chance since i often gets kicked in with heavy spenders i think i am lucky if i can get a kill and then i get 35 honor.
So far am my grand total gains from BG -4k honor.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LordRaider View PostI would like to add some comment too, sorry I forgot before
Battlegrounds are not collectcrystalsground as one of my servermates said. Whoever really battled, that one must be now Elite Crusader at least. Honor losses are not so heavy in my personal case.
I am in 70+ BG group and am one of the weakest. But usually i end with ... lets say ... +80 honor and thats good. I am getting pawned a lot, but its still better than bullying lower levels.
New BG suits me (just personal comment, no arguing with others here).
Therefore very high rangs made by pawning weak alts of other players means now issue. Getting pawned because of collecting crystals only and having too low medallion is now an issue.
But honestly...issue of improper playing I would say. Correct me if I am wrong, of course
Leave a comment:
-
I would like to add some comment too, sorry I forgot before
Battlegrounds are not collectcrystalsground as one of my servermates said. Whoever really battled, that one must be now Elite Crusader at least. Honor losses are not so heavy in my personal case.
I am in 70+ BG group and am one of the weakest. But usually i end with ... lets say ... +80 honor and thats good. I am getting pawned a lot, but its still better than bullying lower levels.
New BG suits me (just personal comment, no arguing with others here).
Therefore very high rangs made by pawning weak alts of other players means now issue. Getting pawned because of collecting crystals only and having too low medallion is now an issue.
But honestly...issue of improper playing I would say. Correct me if I am wrong, of course
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AlexandrusS5 View Postactually you can't enter in the last 5 mins of BG it actually prevents you from doing it by giving you the message stating "The battle has entered the final countdown, you cannot enter now"
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: