Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Requirement for Angel evolution (Seraph stones needed)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by voworld View Post
    needed 981 to get lunaria from epic to legendary - conclusion: table is either wrong or veeeeeery approximate
    I won't do this to Lunaria I prefer Boadicea or Nyssa to Evolve in Legendary.

    Comment


    • #17
      I thought 2200 - 2500 seraph for MAJESTIC? Why is it 2500 - 3200 now?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by BuJayJay View Post
        I thought 2200 - 2500 seraph for MAJESTIC? Why is it 2500 - 3200 now?
        Yes it changes now. 4 days ago, i used/ spent about 3100 seraph stones for Majestic victoriana. so the range not 100% accurates anymore. Just Pray harder and hope for the best result before make a new level angel evo (",)

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by BuJayJay View Post
          I thought 2200 - 2500 seraph for MAJESTIC? Why is it 2500 - 3200 now?
          Check this link of having 5000+ evolution points still not evolving.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by adamusph View Post
            Check this link of having 5000+ evolution points still not evolving.
            Yes for Majestic lately the requirement seems harder. u better prepare more seraph stones hehehe

            Comment


            • #21
              I believe in the recent days instead of x2 evolution, seraph stones were changed to give x1-1.5.
              I love changes like those that we aren't warned about
              <--- 700k+ BR Claw

              Penetrator69:
              everyone knows there was a problem with claws not working how he should've, yet you seem to cry about which to me seems like you cant kill people you used to be able to.
              logic.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Painindaback View Post
                I believe in the recent days instead of x2 evolution, seraph stones were changed to give x1-1.5.
                I love changes like those that we aren't warned about
                Hahaha i like when u said "I love changes like those that we aren't warned about"

                OP ^^v

                Comment


                • #23
                  Unfortunately, I think it is a small bug in 2300 Seraph stone is now in Nyssa and still Mythic!! Why is that??

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    My boadicea bless 2ooo k seraph but its still mythic. everything is a lottery

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      hey can u make an approximate version for blessed stone to

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        for unhearthly used more than 10k seraphs to 15k points so yea this post is nonsense..
                        Last edited by ursuletu_c; 07-01-2014, 05:04 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by ursuletu_c View Post
                          for unhearthly used more than 10k evolve to 15k points so yea this post is nonsense..
                          shame you can't read. He wrote seraph stones, and you are talking about evolve stones. People those days...

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by andreicde View Post
                            shame you can't read. He wrote seraph stones, and you are talking about evolve stones. People those days...
                            sorry i wrote wrong now you can read again ..

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              The only thing they changed are Ancient and Destroyers names. Ungodly and Excelsior respectively

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by ursuletu_c View Post
                                sorry i wrote wrong now you can read again ..
                                well he still said approximately so...it's not always that amount

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X