I see it more as a general discussion than someone trying to justify their actions. If he needs justification to plunder people, and even to plunder the same people again and again, then fine, I can give him that easily.
If someone has a lot of gold when you plunder them, then go for it. If they still have gold when you see them again and the time limit is up, then go for it again. If they move, or spend their gold, then another target is really a better choice than plundering them again cause the point is the gold right? As long as you're not plundering them for personal reasons, then plundering them just to get their gold is perfectly fine. They'll only be able to prove you're harassing them if you take it to extremes, and get personal with them on it. Though if you only ever hit the same person, when there's better targets out there, I can see a sympathetic GM wanting to get on your case about it, so I don't recommend that course of action just for kicks, go find another outlet somewhere for that.
If someone has a lot of gold when you plunder them, then go for it. If they still have gold when you see them again and the time limit is up, then go for it again. If they move, or spend their gold, then another target is really a better choice than plundering them again cause the point is the gold right? As long as you're not plundering them for personal reasons, then plundering them just to get their gold is perfectly fine. They'll only be able to prove you're harassing them if you take it to extremes, and get personal with them on it. Though if you only ever hit the same person, when there's better targets out there, I can see a sympathetic GM wanting to get on your case about it, so I don't recommend that course of action just for kicks, go find another outlet somewhere for that.
Comment