Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Suggestion to make Knights on par with dps of archer and mages

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Suggestion to make Knights on par with dps of archer and mages

    Double the amount of damage that reverse damage does. Then, knights would be closer to even with dps, and it would be skill based. They still wouldnt match the dps, but they would be alot closer.

  • ProNab
    replied
    Originally posted by DeathRiver View Post
    I think KnArAge sounds better, lol.
    I Think... "ProNab" would Suit It Best ~.~

    Leave a comment:


  • DeathRiver
    replied
    Originally posted by Barbarossa View Post
    I like this idea. Then we can all play the same class
    Lets call it ArKnAge or something
    No need to have distinct classes if all classes are the same thing :P
    I think KnArAge sounds better, lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • ProNab
    replied
    http://forum.r2games.com/showthread....k-Knight/page2 <--- For Knights, Follow The Build and Quit Your QQ'ing -.-

    Leave a comment:


  • Barbarossa
    replied
    Originally posted by ProNab View Post
    Suggestion to make Knights on par with dps of archer and mages?...Seriously? Let's Make Mages More Tanky Then...Oh Oh and let's have Archers have more AoE's!...and maybe we can have Mages have a Crit Skill too?
    I like this idea. Then we can all play the same class
    Lets call it ArKnAge or something
    No need to have distinct classes if all classes are the same thing :P

    Leave a comment:


  • Fluxty
    replied
    Knights are strong tanks, they are made to be team players will keep a team from their death when they can't beat a level due to their low defense. Knights will tear up archers in PvP with their defense skills, because archers are built for DPS (and archers will slaughter mages with this DPS). Mages will likely destroy a knight because it takes knights a while to kill troops, while a mage can just AOE right into you, getting a head start.

    At much later levels (55+) you will see knights improve tenfold. They will be a force to be reckoned with, as at this time, their stats start to become significant in battle.

    Leave a comment:


  • Barbarossa
    replied
    Originally posted by Teralitha View Post
    Well there we go. Someone that agrees. Do you think if reverse damage was double that it would have a point in pve? I dont know bout you... but I often see lvl 45ish archers and mages hitting the lvl 70 catacombs. Never see a knight of the same levels do that... Do you know why? Damage. Lots of damage.

    So lets even things up shall we? Give knights increase to reverse damage.
    Even if reflect damage did do an increase in damage its still pointless in pve. The reason that archers/mages get further into the catacombs is better AoE attacks and attacks that can hit the back ranks. Mages especially cause they have Suntoria. Archers have an easier chance cause they can hit multiple times.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cerden
    replied
    I think however, WW should have decreased rage and a 15 second cooldown.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cerden
    replied
    Doubling reverse damage? As a lvl 48 knight, I really think that would be bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • ProNab
    replied
    Suggestion to make Knights on par with dps of archer and mages?...Seriously? Let's Make Mages More Tanky Then...Oh Oh and let's have Archers have more AoE's!...and maybe we can have Mages have a Crit Skill too?

    Leave a comment:


  • Care.Bear
    replied
    reverse dmg seriously aint that bad skill it might not be able to kill ur opponents alone but lets not forget that archers and mages got skills which hit twice (2x reverse) and lets not forget ur other skills afterall reverse aint only skill knights got with ur other skill knight really might end up doing more dmg than archers or mages also in pvp if u have both reverse dmg and agoran shield if ur opponent is close to ur own BR your agoran should last more than 1 turn evne on 2 turns ur enemy get reverse twice + 1 of ur hits while u take nothing this seriously does wonders at lower lvls (dont know much about bit higer lvls except that every1 tells me that knight is op at high lvls) so seriously knight dont even need 4th arena set piece to beat archers with full set and ppl still complain about how weak knight is? maybe its not just always about class and that you want some1 else to blame cuz you simply cant beat every1 else who play this game

    Leave a comment:


  • XrosSlash
    replied
    i fought many knight, funny thing is its always hard fight. so im always pick mage in my duel. i dunno why my fellow knight always make complainin tread about their skill n such.
    i bet, soon will be archers turn. lol ^^

    Leave a comment:


  • lance137
    replied
    if your going for damage why would you even have reverse damage in your spec cmon guy stop complaining about thing when your not spec correctly for what your trying to do.knight has 4 spec pvp tank pve tank pve dps pvp dps once you figure those out you will be just fine.reverse damage is pvp i dont even use in my pve tank spec but you need it to get to apollos shield but is useful for pvp tank spec
    Last edited by lance137; 10-02-2012, 11:34 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • DeathRiver
    replied
    If there's anything I would really want for a Knight, it is for Shadow Thrasher to attack faster. However, Knights still don't need anymore power than they already do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hyorinmaru6
    replied
    Originally posted by LordFireMage View Post
    .zzz you dont know a thing

    ..i wish i played knight

    just so you know knight dominates at high lvls
    Heheh yeah i know i am just saying i wish this was the case
    and other than the extra power wish i am pretty sure asking for more attack speed is resonable
    Even if ur a high level delphic take way way way too long to strike
    and whirlwind is useless takes too much rage and gives lower damage than a plain attack

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X