Originally posted by daunapu
View Post
Originally posted by daunapu
View Post
Originally posted by daunapu
View Post
I'd be MORE than happy for you guys to have Guardian. I don't think it'd make a bit of difference in the end except force a small minority of knights to find something new to complain about being unbalanced. It'd actually make me happy, a few less knights with Chaos and/or Amnesia. Against a Mage w/ a Gaia - those two runes are far more annoying.
Originally posted by daunapu
View Post
By your argument, Guardian is the sole reason a Mage or Archer can extend a fight beyond the Sylph stage it seems, and Knights surviving "almost never" are a once in 100 fights example.
And you think this hyperbole is something "even the likes of (me) can understand at last." That's laughable. Seriously, laughable. Your logic alone is borderline lunacy. If Archers and Mages using Guardian means they survive past Sylph - and a Knight is a 1 in 100 chance of surviving past Sylph in a fair BR fight - then Knight lose 99% of all their (relatively equal BR) PvP fights against another class. Am I correct in this logic of yours?
Because if you're going to say this is true, and you only win 1% of your fights against relatively equal BR non-Knights, then this discussion is over and the judgement is that you're just not a good player. Period.
Comment